What Is Euthanasia?

What would you consider euthanasia? Can it be a peaceful death, a suicide, or a murder? Euthanasia is “…the intentional killing by the act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit” (“Euthanasia. com” Online). This means a life is taken away when a person who is critically ill or a person who can no longer function physically or mentally abdicate their decision making and the family decides whether or not to have the plug pulled. Could you imagine having to make the decision of when to kill your mother?

Well people are faced with this decision every day and the end result is always fatal. Euthanasia is wrong. Understanding why people choose euthanasia, the history of euthanasia, and why it should be illegal, is all important factors to realize this position. To understand why euthanasia is wrong people must know why patients choose to be euthanized. “Ethical problems arise when two or more values suggest conflicting actions or conflicting judgments about a particular action” (Yount 12).

One of the major reasons why people choose euthanasia is that they are experiencing unbearable pain and they fell that if they end their life they will no longer have to brook the pain. Another reason is that people feel they have a right to die and to take their own life. These people have accepted death and are willing to leave the earth by using the process of euthanasia. “Supporters of legalization believe that terminally ill individuals have the right to end their own lives in some instances” (Leone 7). People have to realize that this death is wrong.

We as humans can and should not be able to play the role of God and decide when we are ready to die, that is his job. In legalizing voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide we will in fact create a slippery slope that will result in the development from a simple legal right to die to something that is currently taboo becoming accepted. For example, according to the article written by Herbert Hendin called “The Slippery Slope: The Dutch Example” in 1996 Dutch doctors were legally permitted to commit acts of euthanasia.

At first there were strict guidelines that governed the practice to avoid abuse of power that it granted. This law gradually moved from accepting assisted suicide to accepting euthanasia, and euthanasia for terminally ill patients to euthanasia for chronically ill patients. Then it progressed to euthanasia to the physically ill to those experiencing psychological distress. This deterioration of what is and what is not acceptable finally culminated in the acceptance of voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary euthanasia which endangered many poor, elderly and disable patients into being pressured into accepting this act.

Doctors have dealt with the problem of euthanasia dating all the way back to 400 B. C. We have to realize that people are accepting death via euthanasia because they fear the pain that they might have to face or the pain they currently endure. “People have always feared a painful lingering death, and the debate over euthanasia is as ancient as this fear” (Torr 9). It all started with a man named Hippocrates, he is known as the father of medicine. Hippocrates said, “I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel” (“Euthanasia.com” Online).

True doctors have always been against euthanasia, as a doctor they feel it is their duty to keep a person alive as long as they are able to. “Most people would say that the most acceptable standards for judging what health care will be given to which patients are medical ones, and that the best people to make those judgments are doctors” (Yount 21). We as humans must not be selfish and realize that if there is any way a doctor can keep a patient alive that it must be done until the death occurs naturally.

Euthanasia is a very controversial topic when it comes to legalization. Terri Schiavo was a victim of involuntary euthanasia and she got caught in the crossfire of a legal debate. According to cohorts of Euthanasia it promises a peaceful death but that is not always the reality. Terri died the worst way imaginable, she was starved to death. The worst part of all it was not her decision to be euthanized, but her husband took the role of “God” and decided it was her time to go.

“Human life has innate value and that is why the laws of every civilized society prohibit murder” (Torr 28). Euthanasia is murder. If murder is illegal euthanasia should be to, and the people who are responsible for euthanasia should be prosecuted. In conclusion euthanasia is wrong. Understanding why people choose euthanasia, the history of euthanasia, and why it should be illegal has proven that euthanasia is not morally acceptable. “…killing and suicide are always wrong” (Torr 9). Any type of euthanasia is murder, and murder is wrong.

1) Applies to a very small number of situations, therefore unethical to make a doctrine based on this. Modern medicine can alleviate pain and suffering in almost all cases. Accepting euthanasia means accepting the fact that medicine is not advanced …

Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide is an issue that has been included in public debates for decades now. This is due to the morality of the issue and when it can be regarded as acceptable or not. Euthanasia is the act …

Research Question: Should Euthanasia be legally recognized? Thesis: Euthanasia should not be recognized at all as it undermines the overall worth of human life, it is destructive to the practice of medicine and it is an act of killing which …

Many social sectors have been studied in regard to the approval or disapproval of the practice of euthanasia. Among the strongest voices is that of the religious. The predominant feeling among most religions is that euthanasia is not acceptable. Traditional …

David from Healtheappointments:

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy