The biological perspective

In the experiment done by Schachter and Singer in 1962, which is called Cognitive labelling, there is need of arousal and labelling to get emotion. If we are aroused, we will attempt to label it in some way. Emotion occurs when we label our arousal in a particular way. They have done an experiment. They had three groups of people. Each group had different independent variable (IV;variable that you as an experimenter want to change). First group was given an adrenaline and told what the consequences are. Second group was given an adrenaline but they were not told what the consequences are.

And the third group was given a placebo ( it is a pill, but it does not influence us. It can be for example a vitamin and it is given to a people with words that it is some kind of pill which will cure them for example. And they believe to it and they can change from psychological view). All three groups were placed into “angry” or “happy” environment. Each person’s behaviour was observed and each of them was interviewed afterwards. The results were that, first group did what was expected , because they knew what the consequences are – they explained their arousal in terms of the drug.

The second group experienced changing emotions, they experienced anger and happines. Even without knowing that they got adrenaline. They though it is some kind of drug but what kind of drug they did not know. And the third group had no significant change in emotions. But the problem with this experiment was that they did not ask the participants what was the emotional state of the participants before they have done the experiment. IT was also unethical, because they gave them drugs. Therefore we can’t do the experiment( no replication).

It lacks of ecological validity- the environment around them could influence the results). And lastly if we believe in assumptios of biological psychology, then the cognitive labelling must have a biological basis. In this case we meet here with independent and dependent variable. It is manipulation of Independent variable (IV) to determine the effect it has on Dependent variable (DV). We change IV to observe what effect it has on DV. In psychology when we form an experiment we consider two things. Independent and dependent variable..

Independent variable is the variable that you as an experimenter want to change. The experimenter control this. Dependent variable is the thing that we want to expect to change as a result of changing independent variable. The variable that we observe and measure. Dependent variable must always be a quantifiable data (data that can be represented in numbers). The IV in the research done by Schachter and Singer is expectations of participants and DV is emotional response to “happy + angry” environment.

Both the biological and learning perspective use controlled environments as well as observations of natural behaviour for their studies. Behaviourists (learning perspective) only study overt behaviour, behaviour that can be viewed, without looking into the biological reasons for it. Biopsychologists …

The importance of Biology within the field of psychology has been and continues to be widely debated. Some scientists such as Francis Crick, believe that explanations for psychological differences can only be found by the means of studying the biology …

In 1962, Schachter and Singer conducted a study using misattribution of arousal. In this experiment, participants were told that the experimenters were researching the “effect of vitamin injections on visual skills” and gave participants an injection of either adrenaline or …

Drawing on evidence from studies, what are the advantages and disadvantages of these methods? There are three main methods of investigation which psychologists use. This essay will describe these methods: experiments; surveys; and observations; together with a summary of the …

David from Healtheappointments:

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one? Check it out https://goo.gl/chNgQy